Comparing Two Characters from Two Books I’ve Read

Heathcliff and Raskolnikov

Just for fun, I decided to compare two characters from novels I’ve read recently: Charlotte Brontë’s Heathcliff and Dostoevsky’s Raskolnikov. On the surface, these two men are very different. But when you look closely, they arrive at the same place.

Raskolnikov is my favorite of the two, largely because of how his story ends. He surprises me with his confession of murder. A broken and contrite heart He will not despise. But what defined him before his redemption?

I believe it was poverty and pride. Hubris is not a strong enough word for the level of pride he carried. He believed himself to be above moral law, and that belief allowed him to justify murder. His poverty also played a role. He longed for what he believed was due to him. He convinced himself that reason could override conscience. He felt justified in killing the pawnbroker because he saw her as a vile human being.

But being right does not override being good or kind.

Heathcliff, on the other hand, is a brute and a bully. At first, he tugs at my heartstrings. But he quickly loses them as he exacts revenge, domination, and emotional cruelty on everyone around him. He is driven by rejection and humiliation. His tortured soul finds no release except through inflicting pain, even on his beloved Catherine.

I am not sure what he felt for her can be called love. If anything, it seems closer to possession. Perhaps he believed he was entitled to her.

Heathcliff never truly repents.

He exhausts himself on obsession.

Raskolnikov breaks.

He confesses.

He accepts suffering.

He allows love to save him.

In the end, both characters show us how far pain can take a person when it is left unexamined.

Reading classic literature often feels like reading a caricature of modern life. Everything is extreme. These are the kinds of individuals who destroy worlds, who kill women and children. Today, the methods look different. We no longer murder with axes or ruin estates. Instead, we justify, ghost, dominate, withdraw, manipulate, or self-destruct. Our hearts bleed out quietly, often with no hope of healing.

I know how hard it is to look within. I know how hard it is to admit our flaws. But Dostoevsky and Brontë show us, through two very extreme cases, that failing to face and process our pain will destroy our lives.

So I wonder:

Where do I justify instead of confess?

Where do I cling to hurt instead of letting it die?

Where do I believe my suffering should give me a pass?


If this post spoke to you…

Share it with someone who might need it, too. Whether it’s a quiet encouragement or a new way of seeing things, these reflections are meant to be passed along.


Martina Griffin Martina Griffin is a Catholic convert, writer, wife, and mother of four. She writes about faith, motherhood, beauty, books, and the quiet ache of transformation. A lover of popcorn, deep questions, and old classics, she shares her heart at Big Bowl of Popcorn—one post at a time.

Instagram | Facebook | Email Me

Don’t Miss a Post

Stories of faith, motherhood, and becoming—delivered straight to your inbox.

Leave a Reply

Search

Latest Posts

Post Categories

Latest Comments

  1. Cute ♥️

Discover more from Big Bowl of Popcorn

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Big Bowl of Popcorn

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading